An identifiable listing with limited technical evidence
The supplied title is specific about color, size and marketed purpose, which makes it more useful than an unnamed safety sneaker. It is less specific about the test standard, toe-protection marking and conditions behind the slip-resistant claim. Those missing details matter if your employer requires documented performance rather than a product-category label.
Ask the seller for the model code and current protective-footwear label before relying on the shoe for a regulated work requirement. Memory Breach is the product name here; it does not by itself establish an insole thickness, measured cushioning benefit or particular foam specification. Ask the seller for those details if a particular insole construction is important to your purchase.
The practical comparison is a low work shoe
The listing positions this as a walking-style work shoe in triple black. That can be a useful visual direction where a plain low shoe is wanted, but color does not determine dress-code acceptance or floor suitability. If the job requires a boot, a taller waterproof design such as Lansing Mid answers a different need.
For a same-format alternative with accessible manufacturer information, Cankton provides a clearer documented model reference. That does not make it automatically better on a contaminated floor: compare the actual required outsole evidence for either choice.
Do not treat slip resistance as universal
CCOHS explains that no one non-slip footwear type prevents slipping on every surface. A clean floor trial cannot reproduce oil, water or changing workplace contamination safely. Use the employer’s footwear criteria and cleaning practices rather than testing traction by deliberately sliding. The size-8 medium choice should follow fit, after the technical uncertainty has been resolved.